Talk:Indignation

Concerning a potential questionable source
I just now realized that I can use this page to post notes and questions about specific articles, so this makes things much more convenient than leaving a mere HTML text-comment within the article itself, which might never be seen. xD I'll keep the original text-comment in that article, but anyone is free to delete it if they want. (It's the text that is found between the  HTML tags, without the spaces, which is invisible within the rendered article itself.)

Now concerning what I have to say in the first place, I have cited a source which is directed to a YouTube video comment. I know that this is hardly a reliable source, but I can't find other sources in English with information about the indignishon/indigneishon katakana naming change. And I don't know enough Japanese to search for good sources in that language. Still, I know with certainty that what that person said on the YouTube comment was true, since I have the games, and I have noticed exactly the same thing. So should I keep this YouTube source or remove it, and furthermore should I keep my summarized note there (as it is considered "original research", I think), or should I quote the YouTube source verbatim? (Or strike the comment entirely?)

I seem to be asking so many questions all over the place on this wiki community, lol. (^-^);;

Mayu Miyuki 01:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)