Hi, welcome to Aselia! Thanks for your edit to the CC page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Mayu Miyuki (Talk) 22:15, 2012 November 5

I'm morbidly curious what you think this "information" is

>Doesn't own a single game, but I'm watching Tales of Graces f walkthrough and noticed some lack of 'information'.

Before you even attempt to edit the page, let me set some parameters. Chain Capacity only relates to arte costs and nothing else. It has zero involvement in the ability to chain artes in any order - this is the arte chaining system of a given game and is not synonymous its arte cost system, and so it is considered to be a gameplay mechanic. Both of these things are also strictly separate from the concept of Style-Shift LMBS, which I must emphasize only relates to movement on the battle field and style changes. What, pray tell, is the "lack of 'information'" that you think needs to be added, given how each topic is separate and should not be confused? If you dare to think that the arte chaining system and the arte cost system are parallel, I must emphasize that every system has been paired with the opposite of what you might think to be true. Believe me, I know what I am talking about when I made the Chain Capacity page, in an attempt to STOP misunderstandings like this. Chain Capacity is a combo limiter. Nothing more, nothing less.
Byakuren Hijiri (talk) 22:24, November 5, 2012 (UTC)


I completely misread your username and thought it was Kikonu, a problem user who left and will hopefully remain gone. No hard feelings.

Arosia (talk) 01:03, July 28, 2014 (UTC)

Community support

Please be sure to read this and post your support if you'd like.

Arosia (talk) 23:46, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

Look at my edits

I am fine with you creating these artes pages, but you have to adhere to our format, which includes placing {{-}} at the bottom of every page. These descriptions you are adding are poorly worded and lacking in necessary punctuation. Unless someone else provides better descriptions, these pages will be deleted.

Arosia (talk) 00:12, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

RE: Quote Corrections

No problem! I was curious about Rowen's incantation so I adjusted the sound mixing (SFX are wayyy too loud by default >_>) and tested them all myself. I'm almost 100% sure mine are correct, but I'll probably test them again soon just to be sure.

I'm probably going to hang around this wiki for a bit since it's lacking a lot of "fluff" like incantations and stuff. --Ongyoki (talk) 18:03, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

If you're creating pages...

...just thought I'd mention that Jiao is missing a page, and while I don't want anything half-assed, I would like him to have a page so that we have all of the Chimeriad in some shape or form. I'm by no means telling you to create his page; I'm merely making note of it. If I could, I would create the page myself. Also, keep in mind that you are free to use the information from this timeline, which is a credible source. If you do use any of the information, however, be sure to rewrite the information in your own words and don't cite Taleslations since they prefer not to be cited on wikis.

Arosia (talk) 23:37, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

Tales of Hearts R localization

Pages will be moved and adjusted in due time, but for convenience purposes, use the move request log rather than spam the talk pages. That's why it exists.

Arosia (talk) 22:25, November 13, 2014 (UTC)

Arte pages

Stop creating them because you're piling unnecessary work on Lanate, and he already does enough as it is on this wiki. That, or do as he mentioned and create them without the need for him to add what you left out. Lord knows I don't know what all to add, so it really puts a lot of work on him. He's not mean like I am, so that's why I'm telling you bluntly.

Arosia (talk) 06:16, January 30, 2015 (UTC)

Sandbox abuse

I know you are trying really hard to find loopholes in our rules. And that is why I want to make them even more strictly exorbitant, to get rid of the loopholes. The user sandbox pages are only meant to be used as supplementary information repositories that are yet to be integrated into existing pages. This applies primarily to existing quotes and translations that have not been added to the individual arte pages as of the time they were created, as you will see on my own sandbox pages. (And do note that this refers to existing material, meaning the things that have already been published, not that pre-"localized" Zestiria arte name nonsense that you want to upload despite the policy that we will not acknowledge these arte names because they are still in development and subject to change. A certain Mabizerk is perfectly adept at making these lists himself on a non-wiki venue where it is more appropriate and conducive to discussion. It does not belong here. This also applies to every other term you keep changing within the articles just because they aren't artes or character names and are therefore not as strictly monitored. That seraphim stuff, for instance. Why can't it just stay as the official Japanese term until release, when names and terms can be properly confirmed not through trailers or videos, but through actual gameplay. Once again, loophole abuse that needs to stop at this very moment. I partially want to go through the pages and restore all Japanese names, to be kept unchanged until a proper English release is made, except for the fact that I give zero shits about Zestiria as a game and don't care enough about it to do this kind of monitoring.) Alternatively, the sandbox pages can be used for code experimentation without affecting the appearance of other pages, which is the actual real purpose for this MediaWiki system implementation.

The sandbox is not intended to be used to create whole articles that function as whole articles with the purpose of being whole articles, while avoiding possible deletion just because they are not put on the main namespace. In fact, I want to rage-delete the page right now because it is no different from spamming this content onto the main namespace anyway. In fact, you weren't the first user who tried this. Another user got banned for spamming writing that is literally on the same level as "Halflife: Fulllife Consequences" as multiple articles placed on sandbox to avoid deletion. But just because it is in the sandbox, it doesn't make it exempt from rules or common decency. But I'll let this one stand so that proper discussion on this matter can be held, since otherwise you will complain that it's just admin fiat if I actually enact anything even with the kind of justifications I always provide. It's times like this where I wish I was still just a normal user, so that I can perform normal user fiat instead and skip having to overexplain myself to people who don't even bother to read what I write.

If you have articles that are in an incomplete state, do yourself a favor and save it offline, like on your computer, and use the "Preview" button whenever you want to see how these pages look when they are published. With this, you are doing yourself a favor by not causing problems like this for anyone else who might feel compelled to edit your text and scrap out all of the unnecessary words and incorrect syntax before you are even done with the page, forcing them to do this incrementally as you add to the page itself, supposing you ever intend to do so. Although, judging by the edit summary you added when you created the page, it seems as if you want others to expand the page instead, without you exerting any effort aside from creating the skeleton outline and maybe adding little tidbits and minor trivia and other inane babble. This is just like those game pages you and others keep wanting to create from the moment they are announced, instead of waiting for something tangible to actually write about in any significant way. I'm not sure if you noticed, but we might be outlawing this entirely thanks to these kinds of obnoxious attempts to create skeleton pages filled with minor and ultimately irrelevant info since the only truly necessary content, the story, is missing because the game is not yet released!

And of course I would spend all of this time writing this out instead of quickly going back to sleep after baby stuff. z____z;;

Audrey Belrose is my spirit animal. (talk) 16:52, August 3, 2015 (UTC)

Tales of Link artes

Thanks for the heads-up on dealing with ToLink artes in relation to official arte pages, I wasn't quite sure how to go about things. Since I'm playing through mainly for artes I'll keep my own list and stick to updating the ToLink pages verbatim.

Allenpergallon (talk) 17:17, April 3, 2016 (UTC)

Arte page focus?

Hey, thanks for all the ToZ arte pages. We really did need them. However, what we also really need are ToG arte pages, and since I noticed you've played the game, you could consider making that a pet project. The main reason I suggest this is because we actually have a lot of images for ToG artes, and I'm gradually working on emptying the Unused photos repository as much as possible so that it doesn't look like we're uploading tons of images for no reason. Thanks again.

Arosia (talk) 04:10, July 29, 2016 (UTC)

I don't see a problem with that. I'll get to it. Also, should Accelerate Mode artes? abilities? get their own pages since Hubert's got their own, or Hubert's is en exemption from the rule since it appears as a freely usable arte in ToZ?—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 11:43, July 29, 2016 (UTC)

First problem: "Tornado Blade" from ToG is not the same "Tornado Blade" from Xillias (single user vs. linked arte). How do we name them?—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 15:18, July 29, 2016 (UTC)

Not sure on your first question. Wait for Lanate to get back from vacation to answer that. The second question: If they have the same Japanese name, our policy is that they get the same page.

Arosia (talk) 17:33, July 29, 2016 (UTC)

ToG "Tornado Blade" has a different Japanese name from ToX/2 "Tornado Blade".—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 17:39, July 29, 2016 (UTC)

Oh. Okay, well. I'd say "Tornado Blade" for ToG and "Tornado Blade (Linked Arte)" for ToX/2. We'll see what Lanate says when he gets back.

Arosia (talk) 17:42, July 29, 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, that, except it'd be "Tornado Blade (linked arte)". Lanate (talk) 05:09, August 3, 2016 (UTC)

Just when I was beginning to like you...

I find this. I am nowhere near as strict as Mayu, and I have done a great deal to improve this wiki. I fully allow users to create pages so long as they aren't half-assed. Care to elaborate on how we're not developing? And when have I ever stopped you from creating pages? This wiki is the most developed Tales resource in the English language, so I have good reason to oppose other English-language Tales wikis. As for the plagiarizing you so proudly pointed out, it was on 2-3 pages. I misunderstood Taleslations's policy, but as you can see from the home page, we have settled the matter.

Our "strictness" is not why the wiki "suffers" as you say, and this has been addressed multiple times in the past. The series simply isn't as large and popular enough to draw in an editing user base as profound as other series. If you have such a problem with this wiki, then why are you still here? A new wiki will only divide the community more. You will not find a hidden group of users waiting for a lenient Tales wiki to come along. This is what we have, and I have taken great strides to ensure we are well-liked and appreciated in the community. There have been few problems over the past two years or so since I became admin, and I don't recall ever being unfair to you. I realize the post is a few months old, but it's good to know where you stand.

Arosia (talk) 05:44, August 8, 2016 (UTC)

First of all, the strictness of this Wiki how I see it is how we could have a bit more "other" articles, like for recurring equipment pieces or monsters since they are a series staple. Another is character articles, mainly how "game announced, but unreleased => can't have an article". I can understand that constantly updating articles as information emerge for the new content may not be liked by the staff much ("We're not a news site," or something like that I heard coming from here at some point). And well, I mainly stick to creating arte articles since they're the easiest and safest IMO to create mainly because I don't really know how it would be treated if I was adding only fragments to characters' articles regarding their "History" sections because they wouldn't probably be "half-arsed". I realize I am not the easiest person to work with, sometimes maybe asking really unnecessary stuff at times and such, but I intend to still work on this Wiki, mainly because of how recognized it is. I admit I had a proposition to join other Tales of Wiki but I firmly believe that staying with this one will be the best option.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 10:08, August 8, 2016 (UTC)

I have already explained why recurring whatever would not be ideal. Want to ask Lanate? I guarantee he will say the same thing, as well as probably provide an even better explanation. As for characters in games unreleased, how do you expect much at all to be written about them? What we know about them is essentially included in their brief bio on the game page. What would be the point? In that same regard, everything is subject to change. As soon as the game is released, I will allow it. Until then, no. It's a hassle.

You are free to add any amount of anything to existing articles. That's how they grow and develop. Starting a page off that way, though? One or two sentences? No. I require at least the CharInfo template and a paragraph (see Ayla). That's about the bare minimum that will be allowed, and I would really prefer more. I did that with certain characters because nothing would come of them any other way. Anyway, I have to cut this short because I'm busy.

Arosia (talk) 00:14, August 9, 2016 (UTC)


Please answer/address my recent questions/statements in edit summaries/on talk pages concerning your edits when you have the chance. Thank you.

Arosia (talk) 20:22, August 24, 2016 (UTC)

Regarding "Blast Gauge": I don't think either "Battle Action(s)", "Rejuvenation", "Banish Blast(s)", and "Switch Blast(s)" require to be links at the moment since they only appear in one game only, and I don't think redirects would be very needed; maybe Lanate has a different opinion on the matter.
Regarding "Infernal Blast": I'm mainly basing the information regarding ToLink stuff on what we have on our Wiki, userspace included. The Largo unit carrying Infernal Blast is not (yet) available in the global release, hence no localization listed there.
Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 21:01, August 24, 2016 (UTC)

In that case, I made changes to two Asbel moves that need to be rectified because I assumed you had made an oversight, but I don't remember which two.

Arosia (talk) 22:36, August 24, 2016 (UTC)

Never mind. I found them.

Arosia (talk) 22:38, August 24, 2016 (UTC)

Probably not? Battle Actions possibly, and that'd just be a redirect to the data page. The latter three are essentially just special artes, and the first is just a fancy name for healing spells that cost BG. Lanate (talk) 00:21, August 25, 2016 (UTC)

If you're interested

ToG and ToX arte images are the only ones left in the Unused photos repository. Since I know you've played both games and enjoy creating arte pages, you can dish them out if you want, and I'll do any cleaning up necessary. My next personal project is ToX pages, so I'll be helping as well.

Arosia (talk) 22:02, January 6, 2017 (UTC)

I'll try to help you with it, but I have some ongoing projects on other Wikis, plus some current real life tasks so that may not be as quick as we'd both want it. Still, I think that when the demo for Berseria will come next week, I'll probably go create articles for that game to help "unload" in the future.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 22:14, January 6, 2017 (UTC)

Okay, thanks.

Arosia (talk) 22:25, January 6, 2017 (UTC)


I'd like to eventually integrate these into page extensions, such as is currently done with location descriptions and certain galleries. My issue is that I want a better way of displaying such links on the main page, as I'm not fond of using the "Notes" section for this purpose. Perhaps a makeshift template embedded somewhere.

Arosia (talk) 06:58, February 4, 2017 (UTC)

Honestly, it'd be a more efficient way to have a just a one big template IMO since having many navigational templates for different aspects of a single is a bit of "all over the place". Also, I'm glad your considering putting those Allusions pages into mainspace. There's just so many thing in Berseria alone that are references to a lot of things.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 09:44, February 4, 2017 (UTC)

Yes that's what I was meaning, a single template. I'll mess around with it sometime today.

Arosia (talk) 20:02, February 4, 2017 (UTC)

For characters, I added gallery links to their individual templates. For worlds and games (also Julio and Caro since they don't have individual templates), I created makeshift templates and embedded them at the bottom of the pages. They can be used for gallery, location description, or allusion links.

Arosia (talk) 23:12, February 4, 2017 (UTC)

If you're still interested in doing allusion pages, they'd slot nicely in with the Lore templates. I'd add it to the main links, but I'm afraid there's too many links on them already. Lanate (talk) 02:30, May 30, 2018 (UTC)
I don't think one more link will do harm. Just please note that there are still things missing on the existing Allusions pages in my userspace (especially regarding TotR).—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 16:53, May 30, 2018 (UTC)

ToB images

Hey. Not to be rude, but I actually already have official artwork of all characters from the World Guidance book.

I'm really just waiting to upload them until the pages are created, as I'm trying to avoid unused photos piling up again. Feel free to upload artes and locations, but I have characters covered with official artwork.

Arosia (talk) 20:29, February 10, 2017 (UTC)


How long do you intend to keep this post up? Obviously, any advertisement of those wikis is a lost cause. In fact, I'm currently writing up an appeal to have both closed, as the Tales of Wiki is dead and Talespedia is dying.

Arosia (talk) 05:12, February 11, 2017 (UTC)

Well, until I delete my Tumblr, I suppose. Just because I'm presenting my opinions there that you might not like doesn't mean I'm required to delete it. When/If any of those two wikis will be closed, I'll just delete links to them.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 08:16, February 11, 2017 (UTC)

I wouldn't have a problem with it if it weren't for the fact that you're spreading false information. The issue with Taleslations was not one of plagiarism, and it's not for you, or anyone else for that matter, to know what it was that we discussed. We have a very solid relationship with Taleslations now, thanks to me. I removed the "official" wording from the Tales of Wiki, and I would say I'm extremely lenient on page creation. The only time I don't allow it is if it's like a single sentence or formatted entirely wrong.

There's not even a remote chance that another English-language wiki could match the information we have on this one at this point, so obviously, my stance will always be that other wikis for this series should not exist. It's not incredibly popular outside of Japan, and creating alternative wikis will only divide an already small community. And don't think I'll ever stop administering this wiki. In the immortal words of Mayu, the day I stop editing this wiki, you can pretty much assume I got hit by a car or something. All I'm saying is your "opinions" are baseless and tactless.

Arosia (talk) 08:30, February 11, 2017 (UTC)

I can write an emendation at the bottom of that post speaking about my false assumptions. Wouldn't just deleting that post be denying of myself? I'd rather be a person who admits to an error than pretend it didn't happen and explain what has changed since them. And I'm very grateful that you've became lenient on page creation since I think it helped at least a tiny bit to bring to the wiki like one or two people I think, even though they mostly deal with arte pages, but still it's something.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 08:41, February 11, 2017 (UTC)

ToB locations

Is your list complete, and is it copied verbatim from the game? Order and everything?

Arosia (talk) 08:08, February 13, 2017 (UTC)

From what I know I lack only two locations: EX dungeon and the last Class 4 Administrative Zone, but aside of that the list is likely complete.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 08:22, February 13, 2017 (UTC)

Categories question

I am sure I misplaced Earth Dragon Fang as a Martial Combo Arte, and I can't delete it now. Does that mean that only the admins can change the categories?

HiroIzungo17 (talk) 15:39, August 6, 2017 (UTC)

It's been fixed now. On a side note, both of you be sure to remember that it's "In-Game Descriptions and Battle Quotes". I've noticed this a few times now.

Arosia (talk) 22:26, August 6, 2017 (UTC)

Zestiria/Berseria timeline

I realize there's quite a few red links related to the different eras and ages defined by this series. Rather than having each of these occupy a page of their own, I was considering compiling them into the relevant "History" sections of the Glenwood and Desolation pages, divided by sub-headers so that redirects can be applied instead. I'm mentioning this to you in the event that you wanted to jump on this project since you seem to have an interest in the correlation between these games. If not, I'll figure something out. This page on Allesteiler Wiki would be good to use as reference.

Arosia (talk) 06:37, August 21, 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I can work on history for ToZ/ToB. Just on which article it should be? I think Glenwood would be a better choice since ToZ is a sequel to ToB. Well, that German Wiki article is also nice as a reference point.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 08:10, August 21, 2017 (UTC)

I'd say wherever it's more relevant, as in which time period it's closest to. Periods occurring prior to Berseria, for example, should go on the Desolation page, and then all periods after that can probably go on the Glenwood page. That's how I'd do it.

Arosia (talk) 22:06, August 21, 2017 (UTC)

Okay, I'll do just that.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 09:08, August 22, 2017 (UTC)


Do you see the recent changes?

Arosia (talk) 12:45, September 3, 2017 (UTC)

Apologies. I see you want them as a single bullet although personally I'd prefer if one bullet was for costumes available to a character and the other was for costumes originating from that character. I understand you want to minimize the amount of Trivia, but I think in this case you're overdoing it. Still, I'll adapt.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 12:50, September 3, 2017 (UTC)

I'm tempted to remove it all, actually. Read my talk page.

Arosia (talk) 12:52, September 3, 2017 (UTC)

Just stop.

Arosia (talk) 12:54, September 3, 2017 (UTC)

It is pointless to try to reason with you on anything because you have to have it your way. You make a career out of making useless edits to make it seem like you're actually doing something. Right now? You are doing nothing but producing more cleanup for me later when I do away with all this mess and put everything on a single fucking page. Like I said.

Arosia (talk) 12:56, September 3, 2017 (UTC)

You have wasted over an hour of both your time and mine.

Arosia (talk) 12:57, September 3, 2017 (UTC)


Pay attention to your linking on arte pages because I do not like having to fix each one. It's hard enough trying to keep arte pages clean and consistent. I've warned you about this before.

Arosia (talk) 23:24, September 30, 2017 (UTC)

Honestly, I'm a bit unsure on linking in the arte pages. From what I understand, the first instance of the article name is to be linked, with the exception of "Appearances" section where all games are to be linked?—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 09:59, October 1, 2017 (UTC)

Right, but you're linking in the "Arte Description and History" section when the game is already linked above. Refer to my edits.

Arosia (talk) 19:41, October 1, 2017 (UTC)

Okay, thank you.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 19:53, October 1, 2017 (UTC)


We don't do latest any more. We only move when a name has strictly more localizations than the current name, otherwise we have the Fireball / Fire Ball issue. - Lanate 2017

There you have it.

Arosia (talk) 05:13, November 16, 2017 (UTC)

Understood. In that case, I think updating Aselia:Manual of Style#Titles and Section Headings, "If there is a tie in the number of localized names, preference should be given to the most recent localized name.", to be precise, would be advised to something like "If there is a tie in the number of localized names, preference should be given to the older localized name."—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 20:06, November 16, 2017 (UTC)


You mess this up quite a bit so I figured I'd finally say something about it. You frequently fail to employ necessary identifiers in your writing, article adjectives such as a, an, and the, which leaves sentences sounding awkward. It's actually very frustrating when you create arte pages because I know I have to look over them for these very mistakes, among others.

Arosia (talk) 18:15, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

Apologies. Grammar is not my strong suit, although I try to improve. I'll keep in mind to review my sentences more than before. And thanks for fixing all those errors, I really appreciate it.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 18:38, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

A Question

Ok, so I've already asked Arosia for her opinion on the subject, so she recommended me that I ask you for your opinion as well. Should the Empyrean's Throne from Tales of Berseria and Artorius's Throne from Tales of Zestiria be one single page? They're practically the same location, just two games and one-thousand years apart.

--UnlimitedMoeWorks (talk) 01:18, December 15, 2017 (UTC)

I think we should keep them apart. If we decide to put Berseria and Zestiria location articles on the same page where it is applicable we might get into conflict on which name should be the article's name: Berseria's or Zestiria's. Also, keeping them on separate pages will reduce spoilers for the other game by a significant amount IMO.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 14:57, December 15, 2017 (UTC)

Stop creating arte pages

It's become more of a hassle than anything, so take a break from it or something, I don't know. You do just fine with all the Rays stuff so stick with that, but I can't handle your arte descriptions anymore. There's some disconnect you have with the English language that just makes them sound awful, and I'm not going to waste my time researching these artes' appearances to write the descriptions myself. Just do something else.

Arosia (talk) 01:40, December 17, 2017 (UTC)

Images for arte pages lacking them would be great.

Arosia (talk) 18:38, December 20, 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Just want to say thank you for actually being a decent contributor who keeps things updated while knowing the rules and how to abide by them.

Arosia (talk) 00:29, February 28, 2018 (UTC)

Thank you too. That's really kind of you to say that. I'll keep on helping out to the best of my abilities.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 17:08, February 28, 2018 (UTC)


Please note my fixes to your edits. A semicolon is used in those instances.

Arosia (talk) 00:28, April 2, 2018 (UTC)

Wait, can we have a discussion about this? I was under the impression that we used commas for those instances, and only used semicolons to separate out flatly different localizations or when they have special modifiers, such as Skill or Cutscene. Lanate (talk) 02:46, April 3, 2018 (UTC)
Oh, I see how a literal reading of the rules leads you to that conclusion. It wasn't what I intended when I wrote that section though. Lanate (talk) 02:49, April 3, 2018 (UTC)


Arosia (talk) 02:50, April 3, 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, you can blame me for this; Kaimi was following my example. The idea is that the semicolons represent sections, while commas represent elements in that section:
A (First Aid), B (First-Aid), C; Skill: D, E (First Aid), F
To parse this, it represents A, B, and C have access to it as an arte, while D, E, and F have access to it as a skill. It's localized as "First Aid" when used by A, D, and E, as "First-Aid" by B, and not localized when used by C and F. I'll do back over the other arte pages and standardize them while updating the Page Outlines. Lanate (talk) 02:56, April 3, 2018 (UTC)

Okay, thanks and sorry.

Arosia (talk) 03:04, April 3, 2018 (UTC)

My fault for not properly updating the page outline. Lanate (talk) 03:05, April 3, 2018 (UTC)


Thank you for all the work you've done for the wiki, and good luck.

Arosia (talk) 23:04, April 5, 2018 (UTC)

Thank you and I wish you success in your future endeavours.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 13:30, April 6, 2018 (UTC)

Tales of the Rays - Final Chapter

Hey, Kaimi. You explained that the Shadow Battles in Tales of the Rays are a part for achieving the final part of the final chapter, so I wondered if you have any idea what exactly I have to do to unlock it? I beat all four shadow beasts on all different difficulties, but the completion rate doesn't go above 57,4%. I can't imagine that they didn't put the final part in the game, because right now the ending of the 14th chapter doesn't fell like a true ending at all.

Combatir (talk) 19:15, May 9, 2018 (UTC)

I'm not sure if you have to do this on a single general, on each of the generals, or it accumulates points acquired by defeating all generals regardless of whom they are, but we need to acquire 2,000,000 points to unlock the second part of the final chapter. Like I said before, not sure if those 2,000,000 points you need to accumulate on a single general, on each of them (which would bring us to the minimum of 8,000,000 points total), or do they sum up all shadow generals. Right now I'm focused on Sara's event. And the total points acquired are accumulated once every 24 hours to my understanding.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 20:23, May 9, 2018 (UTC)

Oh, so it's like that all players are working together to unlock the final part. I see. I just saw the info-part to the Shadow Battles and for me it seems that we have to reach those points for each shadow beast (and Dist is already finished).

Combatir (talk) 20:51, May 9, 2018 (UTC)

Exorcist Cards

Hey, Kaimi! Just to let you know, the Melchior Card is Rank 10. :) You can learn that from a child in Yseult (I think, maybe it was Haria) who mentions that the Magillanica Rank 0 Card appears under the Melchior Rank 10 Cards when the sticker is removed.

I also noticed a mistake in your notes about the Empyreans. Amenoch is not male, but female. Her gender is the only known of the four elemental Empyreans.


Combatir (talk) 19:34, August 29, 2018 (UTC)

Ah, thanks about those exorcist cards. I got the Magillanica card info from the Haria kid too, but couldn't recall who was the rank 10 exorcist. Also, I'm pretty sure Amenoch was referenced several times as a guy, but I am unsure TBH.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 19:57, August 29, 2018 (UTC)

No, Amenoch is only mentioned as female. For example, when you first visit Yseult you will talk to the merchant who thought Grimoirh was Amenoch. He will call her a female. :) I bet that she is also mentioned in the Palamedes temple since it is one of her temples.

Combatir (talk) 20:24, August 29, 2018 (UTC)

Content Moderator

Would you be willing to accept a Content Moderator position? Your contributions to the wiki have been valuable, and you have a good grasp of the rules, especially with artes. Lanate (talk) 18:16, December 7, 2018 (UTC)

If you think I'm up for the task, then I don't mind. Still, whenever I'll be unsure of something expect me to come to you with questions. ;) —Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 20:15, December 7, 2018 (UTC)

No wiki for "Monster"? Why?

>Housekeeping: Please put some substantial content before publishing in mainspace; at least work on the article in your userspace if you need.

The only reason I putted that article there in the first place because most Tales games of went on about monsters until Zestiria yet no one had seem to have done it compared with the spirits article. And on top of that most wikis have been saying that copy and paste from other wikis to provide better information to improve is wrong. And so I figured, "why not just put some adjust pieces in first and let the others fill in the background afterwards when the get the chance?".
Sonic2479 (talk) 5:33, January 6, 2019 Camden NY
Our current policy is to have no stub-type articles in the mainspace. We simply lack in the number of active contributors to provide substantial expansions when an article is just a sentence or two wrong with loads of sections.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 10:02, January 7, 2019 (UTC)

Does this wiki look like its getting low on certain things?

I check out the Demon page and it looked like something that might be somewhat disapproving comparing the part you haven about The Heavenly Steppes on that page. So I had to make certain adjustment and since would did say about not wanting about empty spaces in a created page, I thought "Why not make this page like this, and surly in tome someone might create the pages and fill in the red ones?" I mean honestly, do you at least ever stop and thing to yourself that even this wiki is getting low on even the races/species thing? Besides, there are humans through out most of the Tales games right?
Sonic2479 (talk) 11:37, January 7, 2019 Camden NY
First thing, titles of our non-list articles are generally in singular form so putting "[[malak]]him" is an acceptable and prefered form. Second, not every thing needs to be an article, like "human" and "animal"; while we could use a "Monster" article on which focus is put on where monsters are tied to the world building and are not just there to serve the party as EXP generator (like, ToS:DotNW, ToZ/ToB, and some other) it's generally prefered if a rather substantial article appears in the mainspace; you are free to work on it in your userspace. I know that Aselia might not be the easiest Wiki to work with, but this is the way it had been for as long as I remember and it worked pretty well. You are free to contact Lanate to suggest changes regarding our policies as they are the admin here and I am a Content Moderator so I can't change things "just like that"; there needs to be a consensus that's most beneficial to everyone.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 22:56, January 7, 2019 (UTC)

Boss Artes

Have you found any information regarding the artes used by the bosses Alice, Magnar, Zagi, Van Aifread, et cetera? I wish Oscar Dragonia were a playable too...--Hiromichi (talk) 21:31, February 27, 2019 (UTC)

The best you can do is to watch videos on YT and base descriptions on that.—Kaimi (999,999 CP/5 TP) ∙ 22:09, February 27, 2019 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.